• Molly Watson

Secretary of Education DeVos declines to seek Congressional FAPE and LRE waivers to IDEA

On April 27, 2020, the U.S. Department of Education issued a letter to Congress from Secretary of Education DeVos indicating that she is not recommending Congress pass any waivers to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) during the COVID-19 crisis regarding the provision of a free appropriate public education (FAPE) in the least restrictive environment (LRE).

In the Coronavirus Aid Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act Congress had requested that Secretary DeVos consider whether waivers were needed to provide limited flexibility to state and local education agencies during the coronavirus health emergency.

The letter states that as the Department of Education reviewed applicable Federal law, they did so with these core principles in mind:

1. The health and safety of America’s students, teachers, parents, and administrators is a top priority;

2. Learning must continue for all students;

3. Decision-making must be based on what is best for students, not the “system;”

4. Parents must be informed about the impact waivers will have on their children’s education and consent to those changes; and

5. Services typically or historically provided in person must naturally occur differently.

The letter specifies that Ms. DeVos has chosen not to seek waivers regarding the provision of a FAPE in the LRE because she has determined that there is no reason that a student's access to a FAPE cannot continue through distance instruction or other alternative means.

Please stay safe during the coronavirus health emergency.

Education Attorney Molly Watson

A special education law firm serving California families

Contact us about our pro bono representation for due process cases: 530-273-2740,

or write us at caledattoreny@gmail.com


Recent Posts

See All

Fry v. Napoleon

1 if, in a suit brought under a statute other than the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), the remedy sought is not for the

816 Fed.Appx. 222 (Mem)

816 Fed.Appx. 222 (Mem) This case was not selected for publication in West's Federal Reporter. See Fed. Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 generally governing citation of judicial decisions issued on or

2020 WL 5651279

2020 WL 5651279 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Lexyington MCINTYRE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EUGENE SCHOOL DISTRICT 4J, Defendant-Appellee, and Cheryl Linder; Andy Dey; Michael Stasack;

915 Highland Point Drive
Suite 250
Roseville, California
333 University Avenue
Suite 200
Sacramento, California
1901 Harrison Street
Suite 100
Oakland, California
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Tumblr Social Icon
  • Instagram

The information on the Caledattorney website is general information for California residents only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice or relied on for any individual case or situation.  We serve clients throughout California and  Northern California including Fresno, San Jose, PlacervilleStockton, Redding, Chico, Auburn, Grass Valley, Sacramento, Truckee, Marysville, Redding, San Francisco, Truckee, Elk Grove, Yuba City, EurekaSanta Rosa, Vacaville and Fairfield.

Molly Watson is available to meet with parents by Skype or FaceTime.


Serving exceptional children & their families